Jameson, A.: 1989, But what will the listener think? belief ascription and image maintenance in dialog. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Chia Laguna, Italy, 1886-1893. and Weis, T.: 1995, Adaptive provision of evaluation-oriented information: Tasks and techniques. In: Proceedings of 1994 Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 344-351. P.: 1994, The automated mapping of plans for plan recognition. Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park, CA., 721-762. Matheson (eds), Readings on Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis. and Moses, Y.: 1990, Knowledge and common knowledge in a distributed environment.
In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on User Modeling, Chia Laguna, Italy, 121-127. J.: 1996, An approach to user modeling in decision support systems. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multiagent Systems, ICMAS'95, 125-132. H.: 1995, A rigorous, operational formalization of recursive modeling. In: Proceedings of Sixth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge, 44-64. Y.: 1994, A knowledge-based framework for belief change Part i: Foundations. and Herskovits, E.: 1992, A Bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks form data. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 10-63.Ĭooper, G. Sag (eds), Elements of Discourse Understanding.
R.: 1981, Definite reference and mutual knowledge. I.: 1998, Using decision trees for agent modelling: A study on improving prediction performance. MIT Press.īinmore, K.: 1982, Essays on Foundations of Game Theory. Pollack (eds), Intentions in Communication. and Nicholson, A.: 1998, Bayesian models for keyhole plan recognition in an adventure game. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on User Modeling, Chia Laguna, Italy, 363-365.Īlbrecht, D., Zukerman, I. and Bud, A.: 1997, Towards a Bayesian model for keyhole plan recognition in large domains.
#Tad cooper gi update#
We have implemented and tested our method in two domains, and the results show a marked improvement in the quality of interactions with the belief update in both domains.Īlbrecht, D., Zukerman, I., Nicholson, A. Analogously, the models on deeper levels of modeling can be updated the models that the agent thinks another agent uses to model the original agent are revised based on how the other agent is expected to observe the original agent's behavior, and so on. The beliefs about which model is the correct one are incrementally updated based on the observed behavior of the modeled agent and, as the result, the probability of the model that best predicted the observed behavior is increased. We work within the formalism of the Recursive Modeling Method (RMM) that maintains and processes models an agent may use to interact with other agent(s), the models the agent may think the other agent has of the original agent, the models the other agent may think the agent has, and so on. We present a framework for Bayesian updating of beliefs about models of agent(s) based on their observed behavior.
0 kommentar(er)
